New research from Citi and the Oxford Martin School argues that leading OECD economies would be hundreds of billions of pounds worse off without the contribution of migrants to economic growth.
The new Citi Oxford Martin School GPS report—Migration and the Economy: Economic Realities, Social Impacts and Political Choices—provides fresh evidence on the implications of immigration for the growth and dynamism of economies, and on its fiscal costs and benefits.
The researchers find that migration has had a substantial impact on recent aggregate economic growth in OECD countries:
The findings throw light on the growing disconnect between public perceptions of migration and the actual trends. While in many advanced economies immigration has become a toxic issue in election campaigns and political debate, the authors' fiscal analysis shows no evidence of a trend of migrant 'benefit scroungers.' While there are wide differences, in general migrants:
The report finds that migration raises levels of innovation, productivity and economic growth.
It emphasizes that although migrants are on balance highly beneficial for societies, there are costs and these need to be addressed more effectively. The concentration of migrants in particular areas puts pressure on public services and infrastructure. The authors recommend redistribution of tax receipts to address burdens on local and regional authorities, more active labor market policies, such as education and training for the unemployed, a greater focus on language, certification and other measures which will ensure that migrants contribute more fully and better utilize their skills.
Andrew Pitt, Global Head of Research at Citi, said: "We have tackled the topic of migration and the economy in order to bring a detailed and balanced perspective to a critical global issue. The growing politicization of migration on a value basis, rather than an economic one, is making it difficult to demonstrate the economic case for migration. Failure to discuss the economic importance of the issue is increasing the risk of destructive policy errors at a time when the benefits of high skilled migration, in particular, are becoming less secure for those economies that have thus far been enjoying them. An aging population and high public debt levels risk making fiscal missteps of scale costly. In addition, an intense global competition for talent also risks more extensive consequences of even small mistakes in migration policy."
Professor Ian Goldin, Professor of Globalisation and Development at the University of Oxford, and Director of the Oxford Martin Programme on Technological and Economic Change is the lead author of the report. He said: "Migration is highly beneficial for economic growth. On balance migration raises overall levels of income and employment in OECD economies. Migrants are exceptional people and in the US and UK are two to three times as likely to start a new business or create a patentable innovation than the rest of the population. Migrants in the U.S., U.K. and most other countries contribute significantly more in taxes than they receive in benefits. The depiction of a 'tsunami' of migrants taking jobs is not borne out by the evidence and on the contrary migrants tend to create jobs and raise overall incomes. They also facilitate higher female participation in the work force."
Professor Ian Goldin said that the report finds that "perceptions regarding migration tend to exaggerate the scale of migration. People are often more comfortable with migrants in their local community than with what they regard as the national challenges that migrants pose."
He said the report showed there is "very little connection between the levels or changes in migration and the politics and the rise in anti-migrant sentiment does not generally result from higher levels of migrants. The increase in anti-migrant views is being spearheaded by shifts in party politics, rather than broader social attitudes or changes in immigration."
Information on Professor Ian Goldin is available at www.iangoldin.org. He can be found tweeting at @ian_goldin
For interviews, images and further information, please contact:
Susan Monahan, Senior Vice President, EMEA Public Affairs, Citi
+44 20 7508 0786
+44 7528 348 950
This report forms part of a series of joint Citi-Oxford Martin School reports, which can be found here: https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/policy/publications/
The reports are part of a wider collaboration between Citi and the Oxford Martin School, which also includes joint research programs on Technology and Employment and Inequality and Prosperity.
Citi, the leading global bank, has approximately 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 160 countries and jurisdictions. Citi provides consumers, corporations, governments and institutions with a broad range of financial products and services, including consumer banking and credit, corporate and investment banking, securities brokerage, transaction services, and wealth management.
Additional information may be found at www.citigroup.com | Twitter: @Citi | YouTube: www.youtube.com/citi | Blog: http://blog.citigroup.com | Facebook: www.facebook.com/citi | LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/citi.
Oxford Martin School
The Oxford Martin School is a world-leading centre of pioneering research, debate and policy for a sustainable and inclusive future. It supports teams that cut across disciplines because this century's challenges cannot be understood and addressed by any one academic field alone.
The School invests in research that conventional funding channels can't or won't take on but which could have a major impact on the wellbeing of this and future generations, and seeks to have an impact through new approaches to big challenges, scientific discovery, technological innovation and evidence-based policy recommendations.
Find out more at: www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk on Twitter @oxmartinschool and on Facebook at: www.facebook.com/oxfordmartinschool