“The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn’t understand… the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had.”
An ‘experiment in anarchy’... that’s an interesting phrase.
Merriam-Webster defines anarchy as “wild behavior in which the people in a group are not controlled by rules or laws.” ‘Not controlled by rules or laws’…another interesting phrase.
We could synthesize the two quotes this way: “The Internet allows rules to be broken.” And, virtually everything in the pre-Internet media ecosystem is governed by rules. The rules aren’t arbitrary. Rather, they’re dictated by the hard, profit-maximizing logic of microeconomics. Here are a few examples:
In simple terms, the Internet has done three things: 1) lowered the barriers to video entry, 2) offered advertisers a better value proposition and 3) given consumers more flexibility. For media incumbents, that’s a potent cocktail that can quickly lead to value destruction.
But, when investors try to navigate the complex media/telecom ecosystem, they usually run into two problems. First, Hollywood economics are, perhaps intentionally, opaque. Second, the telecom world is steeped in complex engineering. This makes it particularly difficult for investors to assess the risks and opportunities.
So, our aim in this note is to do something simple: explain how — and why — the media and telecom world will change as Internet video — and Internet ads — move to center stage.
Here’s the punchline: We expect value to migrate from content aggregators — like cable networks — to last-mile Internet access providers. Let’s see why…